RECENT COMMENTS ON SEARCH ENGINE ROUNDTABLE

Below are the most recent 30 comments. I try to keep it clean of comment spam, but some times things get through and it takes me several hours to get to it. So please excuse any of that comment spam.

Subscribe  Subscribe to Recent Comments

Comment ID #5244955244 at 01/28/2021 05:24 am:

F5 WebStudio commented on Google Can Penalize Your Network Of Sites For The Same Manual Action

Most WP sites when you break them down to their layout and basic building blocks are just the same as a theme but with different images and to be honest - most have similar layouts. There is another problem, these sites were built in the same way that means the person use a tool to create content for these sites. This is not surprising and, indeed, is unavoidable. Many people say that content is king, but do nothing to create a good content. Also this case provides details about how Google works.

Comment ID #5244949519 at 01/28/2021 05:16 am:

F5 WebStudio commented on Google Drops Review Snippets For Attorneys

Could Google add a price for lawyers? Anyway it is a reasonable solution to drop review snippets for lawyers.

Comment ID #5244947891 at 01/28/2021 05:14 am:

F5 WebStudio commented on Google Price Drop Enhancement Documentation

Thank you.

Comment ID #5244906441 at 01/28/2021 04:15 am:

Sb Global Infosoft commented on A Google Search Ranking Update Brewing?

Digital Marketing Services, Local SEO Service, PPC Services, Web Design & Development, Ecommerce Web Development at Sb Global Infosoft.

Comment ID #5244853062 at 01/28/2021 02:31 am:

Bharat Sinon commented on Google Says You Can Rank For Medium Competitive Keywords Without Links

Yes, possible but with low or medium competition, one of my friend starts site 1 year back and he wrote some content and then he left the site, but surprisingly his keywords were ranking automatically, now he is working on redesign and internal inking - his website is <a href="https://www.moomez.com/">moomez.com</a>

Comment ID #5244817558 at 01/28/2021 01:12 am:

Priyanka singh commented on Google Continues Featured Snippets Supplemental Injected Links

This is really interesting to see, how google is continuously making a change in the SERP's to provide the users with the most relevant results. I think it will beneficial for the users to search the desired results but the tasks is going difficult for the SEO's Experts.

Comment ID #5244548240 at 01/27/2021 07:09 pm:

Shalev Levi commented on Google Ads Testing Site Label In Search Ads

I think it is a label meaning NOT LANDING Page, but a full site.

Comment ID #5244309002 at 01/27/2021 03:33 pm:

John W. Wagonis commented on Google Ads Testing Site Label In Search Ads

I just checked one of my ads, and I did not see the word Site. So Google must not be doing it on all ads.

Comment ID #5244251067 at 01/27/2021 02:48 pm:

free fire commented on Google Search Console Issues With Canonicals & AMP Reporting?

can you somebody's help me for rank my page with 50 keyword? my page adult classified. if you interest then send me your proposal to adsnoty @ gmail com. thank you

Comment ID #5244143782 at 01/27/2021 01:26 pm:

Kevin Marshall commented on Google Search Console Mistakenly Sending Emails To Users To Verify Sites

My account is connected to about 30 GMB businesses, and my Inbox has been blowing up with these emails all day long. Usually the emails are missing the first few letters of the real domain.

Comment ID #5244097021 at 01/27/2021 12:51 pm:

Scott Hartley commented on Google Drops Review Snippets For Attorneys

Not a surprise here who would have thought companies reviewing themselves would all give themselves 5 stars it was too exploitable.

Comment ID #5243931518 at 01/27/2021 10:48 am:

Lanie Dane commented on You Can Now Opt To Remove Trending Searches In The Google Search App

This doesnt work. Still not showing searches. Trendingsearches toggled on, web activity paused, google still not giving trending searches. New solutions please.this all over the internet tip DOES NOT [email protected]

Comment ID #5243930391 at 01/27/2021 10:48 am:

Bala commented on Google Ads Begins Identity Verification With Email Notifications

They are only showing business name right? Or Are they behind the person?

Comment ID #5243827182 at 01/27/2021 09:27 am:

Jeff Fidler commented on Google Ads Testing Site Label In Search Ads

What's the downside to this? Personally I think it's a good thing.

Comment ID #5243799037 at 01/27/2021 09:01 am:

Barry Schwartz commented on Google Publishing Content Requires A Code Push

Just the body of the content, not the whole HTML page. There is a home grown CMS here with a database. I just don’t like using WYSIWYG editors when I write the stories. I like more control.

Comment ID #5243797706 at 01/27/2021 09:00 am:

I'm stupid, sorry commented on Google Publishing Content Requires A Code Push

<b>"Did you know that these blog posts are all written in HTML? I do not use a WYSIWYG editor of any kind? But this is a crude and old CMS, so not real code pushes are needed for me to publish content here."</b> Sorry for being late. But Barry, can you confirm that you actually do manually edit HTML code daily to make these posts public? If that is true, then Kudos to you for doing this for more than a decade.

Comment ID #5243749949 at 01/27/2021 08:12 am:

Avi Buchbinder commented on Google Can Penalize Your Network Of Sites For The Same Manual Action

I believe he was referencing that if they were built the same way (Thin content, little to no value for the user) then they just found the rest by being a network.

Comment ID #5243744172 at 01/27/2021 08:06 am:

joamuk commented on Google Ads Testing Site Label In Search Ads

I've got just one question. Why?!!!

Comment ID #5243742161 at 01/27/2021 08:04 am:

joamuk commented on Google Can Penalize Your Network Of Sites For The Same Manual Action

If sites with the same structure can be hit, god help anyone running Wordpress with a Twenty-Twenty theme.

Comment ID #5243505706 at 01/27/2021 02:08 am:

Cora SUX commented on Google Says Paying For Content Review Or Time With Links Is Paid Links

Ted, how many sites of your own have you rank as of lately? I mean having this "powerful" one of a kind tool would be beneficial for you, no? And don't count how you were taking the whole page of the SERPs back when Netscape was around. We are not interested in that.

Comment ID #5243504383 at 01/27/2021 02:05 am:

Cora SUX commented on Google Says Paying For Content Review Or Time With Links Is Paid Links

Btw "EAT doesn't exist as I can't measure it", sorry that you don't have the ML capabilities of G, once you have access to their own private structure maybe you would, can't happen with your software as of now. To say that something doesn't exist as it can't be measured by your tool running on a consumer computer is like telling the world NASA doesn't exist as nobody can't build a rocket for the Moon in their backyard. This all proving how flawed your tool is, it's only measuring correlations from the end result and that's making it pretty much nearly useless.

Comment ID #5243502185 at 01/27/2021 02:00 am:

Cora SUX commented on Google Says Paying For Content Review Or Time With Links Is Paid Links

Google serves pretty much the whole world and is a private entity. It has the right to impose its own rules on their own ranking system just like you have your own rules to apply in ranking soup tastes in your own private company that ranks foods. Exactly because Google operates pretty much in free enterprise countries around the world, not just the US, it has it's own right to do whatever they want without breaking the laws. If it was a government entity that is then it would apply different rules. Deplatforming is completely legal exactly because they are a private company operating in free enterprise countries without any kind of government status. They don't tell you what you do is illegal, they don't deny you that right to do whateer you want, they just say it would have consequences in their own ranking system which is a ranking system of their own company and not the government. So any of your "free speech", "i can do everything" logic is out of the question. None of what they say is a law and none of what they guide you to do is a law. You can still do whatever you want under the law, it would have consequences to their company's ranking system just like a bad soup would have low ratings in the private company's system for ranking foods somewhere. P.S, Your tool is loosing to others as it is intended for data aggregating, not action-oriented. Look Surfer, Phrase and POP and realize why they are winning and you - not.

Comment ID #5243497174 at 01/27/2021 01:48 am:

Just for you commented on Google Says Paying For Content Review Or Time With Links Is Paid Links

Also, stop reading black hat forums for SEO advices and ask Google about it, as you can see this blog is oriented towards doing things properly, not breaking the rules. It's just so funny when people start asking about building their own links, creating their own links and ask JM about it. It's funny as hell. It's like you don't know that you crossed the line already. It's like going to a police station and asking the sheriff how much robberies you must do per day to have a good income. You'll most probably end in jail. Some here, you must understand the rules and regulations placed. Some of you just don't have any breaks, don't you.

Comment ID #5243495980 at 01/27/2021 01:46 am:

Just for you commented on Google Says Paying For Content Review Or Time With Links Is Paid Links

Links are suppose to be happening naturally throw out the web. In order to be a good signal, it must happen independently of yourself. Any link that you buy, rent, negotiate in order to influence your own rankings is against the guidelines. When girls go to a beauty contest, they cannot vote for themselves, they must not sleep with the voters, they cannot negotiate favors with the voters. It's the same with links. You are not suppose to influence that signal yourself. Also, if you are willingly do that, at least don't do it on comments, as you are wasting your time, these are already no followed. In order to get good rankings you must create a website so awesome that others would naturally link to it WITHOUT you knowing about it!

Comment ID #5242857333 at 01/26/2021 02:02 pm:

Dev Jayakumar commented on Google Testing New Sans Serif Font On Desktop Search

Seeing the evolution of a simple search tool to a super power house, Google proved it. It become a part of mankind, survival without Google is just impossible. Wow ❤ and Thanks! Love from India 🙏 Dev Jayakumar

Comment ID #5242852361 at 01/26/2021 01:58 pm:

Actual Wizard commented on Google Reveals Cookie Alternative - FLoC - Federated Learning of Cohorts

I see zero code in the git, just a bunch of markdown files.

Comment ID #5242595565 at 01/26/2021 10:44 am:

Kes Phelps commented on Google Says Digital Public Relations Is Not Spammy Link Building

Online PR is dead, long live digital PR

Comment ID #5242581660 at 01/26/2021 10:32 am:

Barry Schwartz commented on Google Testing New Sans Serif Font On Desktop Search

I am so sorry for missing that. I really am. :(

Comment ID #5242565979 at 01/26/2021 10:19 am:

Matt commented on Google Testing New Sans Serif Font On Desktop Search

I told you about this weeks ago. https://twitter.com/jackalswitch79/status/1347349993892491272

Comment ID #5242339475 at 01/26/2021 06:32 am:

Barry Schwartz commented on Google Price Drop Enhancement Documentation

Sorry, fixed.